Ten chapters and an appendix. Asylum's most distinctive feature is not a low standard of proof but a low threshold of access: INA 208 allows any person who has arrived in the United States to apply, regardless of status. The paper traces the 1980 Refugee Act, the risk allocation implied by a well-founded fear standard below fifty percent, the epistemic problem of private facts occurring abroad, the parametric effects of the 1995 reforms, and the administrative-capacity question behind roughly 2.4 million pending cases in 2026.
The value choice was real. The scale, pathways, and incentives it assumed were not the ones that arrived.
- 01Access, not the standard of proof, is the design choice that produced today's volume.
- 02A sub-fifty-percent standard deliberately accepts false positives to avoid false negatives.
- 03Facts occurring abroad in private are structurally difficult to verify, so credibility becomes the decisive instrument.
- 04The 1995 reforms altered incentives more than they altered eligibility.
- 05Backlog is a capacity outcome, and capacity is set by appropriations, not by doctrine.
- 06The trilemma: generosity, accuracy, and speed cannot be maximized together.
This page is the abstract and outline. The full text is not published on this site.
Full text is a paid publication
The full text — argument chains, cases, citations, and case-law review — is not published on this site. For individual reading, institutional subscription, or citation permission, describe your intended use through the contact form and you will receive a reply.
Request access / inquire →